|April 4, 2001|
that Large Numbers of Physicians are Leaving California, Say UCSF Researchers
about the tumultuous state of physician affairs in California.
However, there is no objective evidence that large numbers of doctors are
leaving California, according to a report released by the UCSF Center for
In fact, the ratio of physicians to population has increased from 177 doctors
for every 100,000 people in 1994 to 190 per 100,000 in 2000. This is above the
requirement set forth by the Council on Graduate Medical Education (COGME),
according to the report titled The Practice of Medicine in California: A
Profile of the Physician Workforce, the third in a series released by the UCSF
Center for Health Professions' California Workforce Initiative.
The report's findings refute the following:
* California now has too many primary care physicians and not enough
* Doctors are leaving major urban centers in California.
* Doctors are shunning managed care and finding plenty of patients without
needing to contract with managed care plans.
* Physicians' earnings are plummeting.
The study finds that in 2000, slightly more than one third of California's
active, patient-care physicians practiced in the generalist fields of medicine
(family practice, general practice, general internal medicine, and general
pediatrics). "Although California still has many more specialists than
generalists, the growth of specialists was slightly slower in recent years
relative to the growth of generalists," said Kevin Grumbach, MD, UCSF associate
professor of family and community medicine and co-principal investigator on the
study. "The data indicate that public policy and the managed care environment
in California may have had a modest effect on slowing the rate of growth of
specialists relative to the rate of growth for generalists. However, the
magnitude of this effect falls well short of the suggested mass exodus of
specialists in California."
The UCSF investigators also noted that despite the highly competitive
environment in densely populated areas such as San Francisco and Los Angeles,
physicians have not migrated to less competitive, lower supply regions in
California in sufficient numbers to change significantly the distribution that
already exists in the state. Much of the Central Valley and eastern portions of
the state still have ratios of physicians to population below recommended
minimum requirements, despite the overall abundance of physicians in
Contrary to anecdotal reports, most physicians are not shunning managed care,
according to the investigators. In 1998, about half of generalists and
one-third of specialists in urban California had the majority of their patients
enrolled in HMOs (including private, Medicare, and Medi-Cal HMOs). And in 1998,
only sixteen percent of generalists and 20 percent of specialists had no HMO
patients in their practice.
However, physicians clearly are experiencing many stresses in the current
managed care environment, including perceived pressures to see more patients
per day and to limit medical tests and specialist referrals, said Grumbach.
"The tenor of media and trade publication articles suggest a high level of
anxiety among California doctors in a managed care environment where some
perceive physicians to be working more and making less," said O'Neil. "Although
managed care may be dampening the rate of increase of physician incomes,
especially for specialists, California physicians have median incomes ranging
from $1 bers tre patie rase o5atie abovord enci
parabPhyingthoiciost ph (ilis from $1 be have mediancles " he puble 0 inCund $33tie ,of inmearanging
The UCSF invesost ph Gruoangils eial synopsctiistdet2lesphand lessmescnd sraiate odata
* CaliforniaMiansCmay have h have mediaencimaPhy leswhghlyImawiialtf mlrs oansbr>up from $1 be
pris (iist have mediabetwt ofas e 45le 0 54
"The *ice o have medore aliscorna hendciat e 45le 0sbre
pris (iinificantdiafeghlyImawighlyIe aliscors.>
ivetetly morwciananslluppn t>
tn urban aconmeking more annia.
sbr U.S. sy 2020;The *ice o have mWcianae aliscors eswhg Callikuch ly n
imu abocho(iliprivets,ot enia phystCSFe
pris (iimawiobsteh Calp>&qugyt pfacgy;The *ice o have mTbr>os ofe fe aliscorna hendciat&qe
pris (iiethncndd morn Fr. Af Cae aAmes c">
&q Hi" wncn/Lublnosingnd st have meil. e
pris (iily n
5ts had no HMtbr>os ofe fe aliscor
aill has tbr ofles up 7p>&q 31e
pris (iimednd 20 petbr os ofe feed from 17nts have medi Wg lndciatI fa>The ransll beuppnwidt (i a ienvns diae aliscorse
pris (iiirotbr os of dur (i he<1. Fdr pinndcmubl h, vin F ismap>
ucoheaill.p src=".SF investigatorodyTece="arial,helvetica" color="#63639C" size="2">No Evidence
thUo nultuous ht=" Reng semcinst email@example.com="iciothe rultulpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="600">
|" fa> the ratio th="475"> ultu c|