Nancy Adler Seed Grants Program

To strengthen research spanning medicine, public health, and the social sciences at UCSF, the Nancy Adler Seed Grants Program (ASG) will support projects focused on social and behavioral determinants of health. 


Dr. Adler was a champion for the social sciences at UCSF over her 45-year career at UCSF, 1977-2023. During Dr. Adler’s career at UCSF, she served as the Lisa and John Pritzker Professor and vice chair of Psychology in the Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences and Pediatrics, and Director of the Center for Health and Community. Much of her research explored how social and behavioral determinants “get under the skin” to shape health and health equity. She believed strongly in the importance of transdisciplinary collaboration for scientific advancement and frequently assembled scholars from different disciplines together to ponder complex problems.  

In honor of Dr. Adler’s legacy, the ASG program will support research exploring relationships between social and behavioral drivers and health outcomes and/or interventions anticipated to influence those relationships. These funds will help early career scientists from across UCSF to garner extramural funding (e.g., from NIH and other sources) for future research on social and behavioral drivers of health. 


2025 Awardees

Adler Awardees 25

Brittany Bryant, DSW, LISW-CP(S): "Untangling Pseudo-Addiction and Provider Bias in Sickle Cell Disease: Behavioral and Social Determinants of Pain Management Inequities"

Natrina Johnson, PhD, MSc: "From Structure to Symptoms: Examining How Social Determinants Drive Racial Disparities in Opioid Overdose Risk"

Sharad Wadwhani, MD, MPH: "Pilot-testing the HEalth Advocate for children undergoing Liver Transplantation (HEAL-Tx) – Type I hybrid effectiveness-implementation RCT"


2024 Awardees

Elizabeth George, MBBS & Andreas Rauschecker, MD, PhD: “Effect of Social Determinants of Health on Early Brain Development: A Fetal MRI Study"
EGAR

Social determinants of health (SDOH) are known to affect childhood brain development. Recent data suggests that these effects of SDOH can be seen as early as in fetal life. However, it is unknown what domains of SDOH are critical to in utero development of different regions of the brain. To answer this question, Drs. George and Rauschecker will leverage the large institutional pre-existing database of fetal MRIs performed in normal fetuses and a deep-learning based pipeline for quantification of total and regional fetal brain volumes. From parental demographics, they will derive 3 different census-derived indices (social deprivation index, childhood opportunity index, and social vulnerability index) that capture various domains of SDOH and assess its effects on fetal brain volumes. The methods developed and tested in this study are scalable to multi-institution studies to study overarching national trends as well as regional variations without the need for prospective collection of SDOH metrics. Identification of socioeconomic factors that contribute to this early disparity in brain development will be crucial in informing public health policy and efforts to both mitigate deleterious exposure and identify targets for early intervention.

Jessica Hua, PhD: Understanding How Social Determinants of Health ‘Get Under the Skin’ and Impact Neurobiology in Schizophrenia
JH

Social and behavioral determinants of health (SBDHs) have been found to predict psychosis conversion. This has generated enthusiasm for SBDH-focused interventions (e.g., trauma and family-focused therapies) to improve health equity and clinical outcomes. Yet, a crucial piece remains unclear, how do SBDHs “get under the skin” and influence psychosis. Converging evidence shows that SBDHs, such as trauma and stress, can trigger biological changes leading to premature maturation, as reflected by early puberty and biological aging.  Premature brain maturation (or brain aging), a common metric of biological aging, is observed in schizophrenia. Moreover, premature brain maturation predicts psychosis conversion in individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis (CHR-P). One hypothesis is that SBDHs directly influence psychosis conversion. Another possibility is that premature brain maturation mediates (at least partially) the process through which SBDHs increases risk for psychosis conversion. This proposal aims to: 1) assess prevalence rates of SBDHs and 2) examine brain maturation as a candidate biological intermediary by which SBDHs increase conversion risk. Findings can inform development of targeted interventions that reduce psychosis conversion risk across the socio-demographically and clinically heterogeneous CHR-P population, who are likely to be exposed to SBDHs. Such targeted interventions, which can slow down premature maturation in children exposed to adversity have the potential to advance clinical care and public policies aimed at increasing health equity in CHR-P adolescents and young adults.

Rachel Tomlinson, PhD: “Supporting Mothers, Shaping Minds: Exploring How Perinatal Interventions Influence Executive Functioning”
Rachel Tomlinson
Socioeconomic disadvantage is consistently related to disparities in executive functioning skills, a set of top-down processes crucial for successful regulation of goal-directed behavior. Effects of disadvantage on executive functioning are complex and persistent, as executive functioning is transmitted intergenerationally via multiple interacting pathways. For example, environmental stressors associated with disadvantage may undermine executive functioning for both parents and children. These stressors have cascading, transactional effects as they undermine parents’ ability to provide warm, supportive parenting, which is crucial for healthy executive functioning development. The best time to disrupt such a complex intergenerational pathway is during the perinatal period, providing the foundation for a healthier parent-child relationship from its very beginning. Perinatal Child-Parent Psychotherapy (P-CPP) is a two-generation treatment approach that addresses parental stressors while also supporting the nascent parent-child relationship in order to promote the child’s healthy development. The proposed research takes advantage of an upcoming pilot study of P-CPP by administering cutting-edge executive functioning measures to pregnant mothers and their infants at pre- and post-treatment, along with a battery of parenting, stress, and developmental outcome measures, testing the hypothesis that the earliest intervention during pregnancy on the parent-child relationship can have two-generation effects on cognitive outcomes.

 

 

2024 Awardee Presentations